6 Oral Presentation Evaluations sorted by date for Kjar, Kirstin

 

1. Class Debate
     in on 5/15/2001 by Michael H. Smith

Basic


Proficient


Advanced

Organization, Preparation, Supporting Materials
Appropriateness of Language and Content
Appearance, Gestures, Eye Contact
Volume, Pronunciation, Articulation
Energy, Creativity, Sincerity
Visuals and Other Features

Evaluator's Comments

Kirstin provided a very clean delivery of her topic, using a variety of statistics to back up her argument.
*Content Score: 92%

 

2. Senior Project
     in on 5/16/2001 by Jetti Matzke/M. Woodbury

Basic


Proficient


Advanced

Organization, Preparation, Supporting Materials
Appropriateness of Language and Content
Appearance, Gestures, Eye Contact
Volume, Pronunciation, Articulation
Energy, Creativity, Sincerity
Visuals and Other Features

Evaluator's Comments

“In oral questioning she did demonstrate having thought about the connection between the research paper and the skill portion and that all of the ceremonials discussed had a common theme/origin in the food-sharing aspect. Just that this skill has developed more in relation to the Judeo-Christian tradition. Despite the two parts being somewhat tangential, both parts were done well. Portfolio was organized and easy to follow. Good visuals, demonstration techniques in the presentation.”
*Content Score: %

 

3. Class Debates
     in on 5/16/2001 by Jetti Matzke

Basic


Proficient


Advanced

Organization, Preparation, Supporting Materials
Appropriateness of Language and Content
Appearance, Gestures, Eye Contact
Volume, Pronunciation, Articulation
Energy, Creativity, Sincerity
Visuals and Other Features

Evaluator's Comments

Kirstin’s articulation and pronunciation are excellent. Her presentation was exciting and she had obviously considered her audience and opponent.
*Content Score: %

 

4. The Great Depression
     in on 5/16/2001 by Deborah Aufdenspring

Basic


Proficient


Advanced

Organization, Preparation, Supporting Materials
Appropriateness of Language and Content
Appearance, Gestures, Eye Contact
Volume, Pronunciation, Articulation
Energy, Creativity, Sincerity
Visuals and Other Features
*Content Score: %

 

5. Peer Interview Project
     in on 5/16/2001 by Deborah Aufdenspring

Basic


Proficient


Advanced

Organization, Preparation, Supporting Materials
Appropriateness of Language and Content
Appearance, Gestures, Eye Contact
Volume, Pronunciation, Articulation
Energy, Creativity, Sincerity
Visuals and Other Features
*Content Score: %

 

6. Peer Interview Project
     in on 5/16/2001 by Nancy Shour

Basic


Proficient


Advanced

Organization, Preparation, Supporting Materials
Appropriateness of Language and Content
Appearance, Gestures, Eye Contact
Volume, Pronunciation, Articulation
Energy, Creativity, Sincerity
Visuals and Other Features
*Content Score: %

 

* Oral Presentations are graded for both content and form. Content scores represent how well the student communicated an understanding of course concepts, skills and facts. 90% and above are considered advanced. Scores lower than 70% are basic.